Evaluating gender-based leadership perceptions in youth sport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.114990Keywords:
Youth sport, coach leader-ship, gender differences, leadership perception, team sports, individual sportsAbstract
Introduction and Objective. The study aims to investigate associations between gender, sport type, and perceived coach leadership behaviors among youth athletes, including potential interaction effects across leadership dimensions.
Methodology. Youth athletes aged 13–17 (N = 240, average age = 14.6 years; 50% girls) participated in a cross-sectional survey using the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS). The LSS measured perceptions across five leadership dimensions: training and instruction, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, social support, and positive feedback.
Results. Perceptions of leadership varied significantly by gender. Girls reported higher ratings of democratic behavior (M = 4.3 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001, d = 1.91) and social support (M = 4.4 vs. 3.6, p < 0.001, d = 2.12), while boys scored higher on autocratic behavior (M = 3.8 vs. 2.7, p < 0.001, d = 2.26). MANOVA revealed a significant main effect for gender (Wilks’ λ = 0.854, F (5, 232) = 7.85, p < 0.001, η² = 0.145) and sport type (Wilks’ λ = 0.891, F (5, 232) = 5.42, p = 0.002, η² = 0.105). No significant interaction was found. Individual sport athletes rated coaches higher in democratic behavior and positive feedback (p < 0.01).
Conclusions. These results emphasize the importance of adapting coaching styles to the gender and sport context of young athletes to maximize athlete development, satisfaction, and retention.
References
Allen, J. B., & Shaw, S. (2009). Women coaches' perceptions of their sport organizations’ social envi-ronment: Supporting coaches’ psychological well-being. The Sport Psychologist, 23(3), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.23.3.346
Bailey, R., Hillman, C., Arent, S., & Petitpas, A. (2013). Physical activity: An underestimated investment in human capital? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.10.3.289
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095
Burton, L. J., & Welty Peachey, J. (2009). Transactional or transformational? Leadership preferences of Division III athletic administrators. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 3(3), 248–273. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2.2.245
Camiré, M., Forneris, T., Trudel, P., & Bernard, D. (2011). Strategies for Helping Coaches Facilitate Pos-itive Youth Development Through Sport. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 2(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2011.584246
Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a lead-ership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.2.1.34
Coma Bau, J., Baiget Vidal, E., & Segura Bernal, J. (2024). Analysis of the self-perceptions of leadership behavior and changes in the position in basketball coaches of the League (ACB). Retos, 60, 490–497. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.105154
Côté, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. The Sport Psycholo-gist, 13(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.4.395
Côté, J., & Gilbert, W. (2009). An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Interna-tional Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795409789623892
Crane, J., & Temple, V. (2015). A systematic review of dropout from organized sport among children and youth. European Physical Education Review, 21(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14555294
Fraser-Thomas, J. L., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334890
Gould, D., Collins, K., Lauer, L., & Chung, Y. (2007). Coaching Life Skills through Football: A Study of Award Winning High School Coaches. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200601113786
Hartoyo, A., Samodra, Y. T. J., Suryadi, D., Hidayat, S., Syam, A., & Sinulingga, A. (2024). What are the trends in shared leadership development and leadership life skills formation through sport ac-tivities: a literature review. Retos, 58, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.107445
Horn, T. S. (2002). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 309–354). Human Kinetics.
Horn, T. S. (2008). Coaching effectiveness. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 239–267). Human Kinetics.
Jin H, Kim S, Love A, Jin Y, Zhao J. Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes' motivations, and athlete satisfaction. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 12; 13:1012953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953.
Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I.M. (2003). Olympic medallists' perspective of the athlete-coach relation-ship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0
LaVoi, N. M. (2016). Women in sports coaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734651.
hartanto, amri, Lestari, A. B., Sukamti, E. R., Fauzi, F., Tomoliyus, T., Sriwahyuniati, C. F. ., & Karyono, T. H. (2025). Mental toughness of badminton athletes: the role of coach leadership type and coach-athlete relationship. Retos, 62, 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.111181
López de Subijana C, Martin LJ, McGuire CS, Côté J. Moderators of the coach leadership and athlete motivation relationship. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Mar;23(3):404-414. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2041101.
Norman, L. (2010). Feeling second best: Elite women coaches’ experiences. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.27.1.89
Pérez-Torralba, A., González-García, H., Guijarro, E., & Rocamora, I. (2022). Transformational lea-dership of the physical education teacher in Early Childhood Education: A didactic proposal: Una propuesta didáctica (A didactic proposal). Retos, 44, 864–875. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.90889
Pires, P. R. I., Batista, M., Mesquita, H., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2022). Relationship of formal training on coa-ches’ leadership and self-determination and well-being of athletes with intellectual disabili-ties. Retos, 46, 480–489. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.93064
Reimer, H. A., & Toon, K. (2001). Leadership and satisfaction in tennis: Examination of congruence, gender, and ability. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608957
Ruiz-Barquín, R., García-Naveira Vaamonde, A., & Núñez Prats, A. (2024). Description of Burnout levels in a sample of young athletes and its relationship with leadership perception and preferen-ces. Retos, 61, 832–852. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.104784
Sampaio, C., & Teques, P. (2020). Perceção de liderança e satisfação em nadadores: os efeitos de me-diação da inteligência emocional (Leadership perception and satisfaction in swimmers: the mediation effects of emotional intelligence) (Percepción de liderazgo y satisfacción en nadado-res: l. Retos, 37, 660–665. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.74347
Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (2008). Coaches who never lose: Making sure athletes win, no matter what the score. (3rd. Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Warde.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Weiss, M. R., & Fretwell, S. D. (2005). The Parent-Coach/Child-Athlete Relationship in Youth Sport: Cordial, Contentious, or Conundrum? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599300
Weiss, M. R., & Williams, L. (2004). The why of youth sport involvement: A developmental perspective on motivational processes. In M. R. Weiss (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 223–268). Fitness Information Technology.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gheorghe Adrian Onea, Stefan Alecu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
