Importance of learning to learn competence in Colombian university students based on multivariate analysis: challenges, opportunities and challenges for education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v55.103860Keywords:
aprendizaje, enseñanza superior, estudiante, competencia profesionalAbstract
Objective. The existing correlations between the second level subdimensions and the first level dimensions and subdimensions of the CECAPEU questionnaire were evaluated in order to know how a sample of university students manifest their learning to learn competence in relation to sex, academic year, sport and age. Method. A total of 257 university students voluntarily participated in the study corresponding to the Faculty of Physical Education of the National Pedagogical University in Bogota, Colombia. This was an exploratory-correlational study of cross-sectional scope. The sample of students is random, since it depended on their voluntary participation. The statistical analysis was performed in three parts: 1) Spearman correlation tests were performed with Shapiro-Wilk test; 2) multiple factorial analysis was performed and; 3) a non-parametric multivariate model based on Wilks' Lambda statistic was used. Results. In general, all the second-level subdimensions presented a positive correlation, which means that students who have higher levels in some of the subdimensions will also tend to have higher levels in other dimensions. Conclusions. It is highlighted that students with high levels in problem solving are associated with having high levels of planning, organization and time management and high levels of self-evaluation, control and self-regulation, while, students who have high levels of social values are associated with having higher levels of attitudes of cooperation and solidarity; interpersonal relationships, highlighting in them the ethical dimension. Finally, five profiles were found that induce to recognize the diversity of the learning manifested by university students.
Keywords: learning; higher education; student; occupational qualifications; university teaching
References
Bazar, D., & Kraft, M. (2017). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors. Educational Evalu-ation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
Becerra Patiño, B. A., & Escorcia-Clavijo, J. B. (2023). Evaluación de la competencia aprender a aprender en estu-diantes universitarios colombianos de Licenciatura en Deporte: estudio exploratorio (Evaluation of learning to learn competence in Colombian university students of Bachelor’s Degree in Sports: an exploratory study). Retos, 48, 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v48.97412
Becerra Patiño, B. A. (2023). La gamificación como recurso didáctico para estudiantes universitarios durante la CO-VID-19. VIREF Revista De Educación Física, 12(2), 107–125. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/viref/article/view/348702
Becerra Patiño, B. A., Reina, C. J., Martínez-Benitez, C. F., Paucar Uribe, J. D., Montilla Valderrama, V., Cárdenas-Contreras, S., Castro Malaver, M. A., Varón Murcia, J. J., & Ávila Martínez, J. D. (2024). Relación de la compe-tencia aprender a aprender, estilos de vida y condición física en estudiantes universitarios colombianos de deporte: Estudio exploratorio (Relationship of learning to learn competence, lifestyles and physical fitness in Colombian university sports students: An exploratory study). Retos, 51, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.100442
Becerra Patiño, B., Romero Aguilar, L., & Cortés Durán, A. (2024). Relaciones entre las estrategias de aprendizaje, la motivación y el contexto personal de estudiantes universitarios colombianos: a propósito del caso de la Licenciatura en Deporte (Relationships between learning strategies, motivation and the personal context of Colombian universi-ty students: a case study of the Bachelor's Degree in Sports). Retos, 52, 374-383.
Caena, F. (2019). Developing a European Framework for the Personal, Social & Learning lo Learn Key Competence. Publicatons Office of the European Union. https://bit.ly/2vBzK8A
Caena, F., & Stringher, C. (2020). Towards a new conceptualization of Learning to Learn. Aula Abierta, 49(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.49.3.2020.199-216
Cañabate Ortíz, D., & Zagalaz, M. L. (2010). Aportaciones del área de educación física a la competencia básica «Aprender a Aprender» (Contributions of the physical education area of core competence «Learning to learn»). Re-tos, 18, 52–55. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i18.34652
CE. (2006). Recomendación del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 18 de diciembre de 2006 sobre competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Recuperado el 29 de noviembre de 2022 de https://goo.gl/6ayK8K
CE. (2018). Anexo de la Propuesta de Recomendación del Consejo relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendi-zaje permanente. Recuperado el 29 de noviembre de 2022 de https://goo.gl/YD9pDw
Díaz, M. S. D. V., Dorado Suarez, A., Zazo, F. J., & Perea, M. R. (2021). El centro educativo como ecosistema de aprendizaje. No, al “fastfood” educativo (Learning ecosystem school. Stop educational “fastfood”). Retos, 41, 638–647. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.86073
Duckworth, A., Quinn, P., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 104(2), 439-451. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782117/
Echols, D.G., Neely, P.W., & Dusick, D. (2018). Understanding faculty training in competency-based curriculum development. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 3(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1162
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Fraile, J., Gil-Izquierdo, M., Zamorano-Sande, D., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I. (2020). Autorregulación del aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación formativa en los trabajos de grupo. RELIEVE, 26(1), art. M5. http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17402
García-Casado, J., Martínez-de-Juan, J.L., Guijarro-Estellés, E., Saiz, J., Guillem, M., Prats-Boluda, G., & Ye-Lin, Y. (2021). Fomento del aprendizaje permanente en estudiantes del grado de ingeniería Biomédica, primeros pasos: identificación de áreas a reforzar en gestión de información y aprendizaje autónomo. Congreso In-Red Universitat Politècnica de València, 1217-1232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/INRED2021.2021.13469
García-García, F., López-Francés, I., Moctezuma-Ramírez, E., & Pérez Pérez, C. (2021). Aprender a aprender en la universidad: perspectivas del profesorado y de los estudiantes. Estudios sobre educación, 40, 103-126. doi: 10.15581/004.40.103-126
García-García, F.J., López-Francés, I, Gargallo-López, B., & Pérez-Pérez, C. (2022). Content validation of the ‘learning to learn’ competence in undergraduate studies. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 40(2), 513-530. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.466271
Gargallo-López, B., Campos, C., & Almerich, G. (2016). Learning to learn at university. The effects of an instrumen-tal subject on learning strategies and academic achievement. Culture and Education, 28(4), 771-810. https://doi.org/11356405.2016.1230293
Gargallo López, B. (Ed.). (2017). Enseñanza centrada en el aprendizaje y diseño por competencias en la universidad. Fundamentación, procedimientos y evidencias de aplicación e investigación. Tirant Humanidades
Gargallo-López, B., Pérez-Pérez, C., García-García, F.J., Giménez-Beut, J.A., & Portillo Poblador, N. (2020). La competencia aprender a aprender en la universidad: propuesta de modelo teórico. Educación XX1, 23(1), 19-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.23367
Gargallo-López, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J.M., Pérez-Pérez, C., Almerich Cerveró, G., & Garcia-Garcia, F.J. (2021). El cuestionario CECAPEU. Un instrumento para evaluar la competencia aprender a aprender en estudiantes uni-versitarios. RELIEVE, 27(1), art. 1. http://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v27i1.20760
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGrawHill.
Hoskins, B., & Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to Learn: What is it and can it be measured? European Communities. https://doi.org/10.2788/83908
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ibarra-Sáiz, M.S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., Lukas-Mujika, J.F., & Santos-Berrondo, A. (2023). Medios e instrumentos para evaluar los resultados de aprendizaje en másteres universitarios. Análisis de la percepción del profesorado so-bre su práctica evaluativa. [Methods and instruments to assess learning outcomes in master’s degrees. Analysis of teachers’ perception of their evaluative practice]. Educación XX1, 26(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33443
Kelly, A. P., & Columbus, R. (2016). Innovate and Evaluate: Expanding the Research Base for Competency-Based Education. Center for Higher Education Reform
Lluch Molins, L., & Portillo Vidiella, M. C. (2018). La competencia de aprender a aprender en el marco de la educa-ción superior. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación, 78(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie7823183
Marshik, T., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2017). Teachers’ and students’ needs for auto-nomy, competence, and relat-edness as predictors of students’ achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9360-z
Martínez, R. (2007). La investigación en la práctica educativa: Guía metodológica de investigación para el diagnóstico y evaluación en los centros docentes. Centro de Investigación y Documentación Educativa (CIDE)
Martínez-Chairez, G., Guevara-Araiza, A., & Valles-Ornelas, M. (2016). El desempeño docente y la calidad educati-va. Ra Ximhai, 12(6), 123-134.
McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: a phenomenological view. En B. J. Zim-merman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Springer-Verlag
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Meece, J. L. (1994). The role of motivation on self-regulated learning. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Selfregulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applicatios. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Merchán Sánchez-Jara, J., Ramos Ahijado, S., & Montoya Rubio, J.C. (2022). Ecosistemas educativos para la práctica musical en el entorno de la Web Social: una revisión sistemática de literatura. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 40(2), 565-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.477721
Moreno, J., Arbulú, C., Montenegro, L. (2022). La metacognición como factor de desarrollo de competencias en la educación peruana. Revista Educación, 46(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i1.43724
Ortega, E.M. (2008). Aprender a aprender: clave para el aprendizaje a lo largo de la vida. CEE Participación Educati-va, 9, 72-78.
Pérez Ferro, L. C., López Domínguez, S., & Arenas Molina, M. (2013). Prácticas docentes y expectativas de los em-pleadores. Una mirada a sus relaciones en perspectiva de la Educación Física. Lúdica Pedagógica, 2(18). https://doi.org/10.17227/01214128.18ludica111.122
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college stu-dents. Educational Psychology Review 16, 385-407. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23363878
Ramirez, L., Ortega, W., & Ortega, A. (2020). Desempeño pedagógico docente y aprendizaje de los estudiantes uni-versitarios en la carrera de educación. Revista de investigación y pedagogía Praxis & Saber, 11(27), e10329. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v11.n27.2020.10329
Säfström, C.A. (2018). Liveable life, educational theory and the imperative of constant change. European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), 621-630. doi: 10.1177/1474904118784480
Wall, K., & Hall, E. (2016). Teachers as metacognitive role models. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1212834
Salazar-Ayala, C. M., & Gastélum-Cuadras, G. (2020). Teoría de la autodeterminación en el contexto de educación física: Una revisión sistemática (Self-determination Theory in the Physical Education context: A systematic review). Retos, 38, 838–844. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.72729
Simón Medina, N., Del Valle Díaz, S., Rioja Collado, N., & Cuadrado Borobia, J. (2023). Evaluación del aprendizaje profundo metacognitivo y autodeterminado en estudiantes universitarios (Metacognitive and self-determined deep learning assessment in university students). Retos, 48, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v48.93421
Vera Rivera, D. A., & Guzmán Pinzón, N. P. (2021). Estrategia didáctica para fortalecer el análisis crítico en la forma-ción de futuros licenciados en deporte. Lúdica Pedagógica, 1(34), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.17227/ludica.num34-14085
Weinstein, C. E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. En R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (291-316). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_11
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners. Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. APA
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Retos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
