Umbrella review of 50 tests about psychomotor competence in preschool education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.94964Keywords:
testing, childhood, child, instrumentAbstract
This umbrella review allows us to know how psychomotricity has been evaluated through the different scales that have been used in psychomotor practice in Early Childhood Education, the objective of the review being to classify these motor evaluation tools. The tests have been used as instruments to assess different aspects of the psychomotor structure and have been used to screen, diagnose, evaluate or supervise the child population for the early detection of any motor deterioration. For the writing of the review, the protocols of the PRISMA 2020 declaration will be indicated. The results of 8 significant reviews will be identified through a systemic search in WOS, ERIC, PUBMED, SCIELO and academic google. 50 tests are classified according to their typology (screening and/or diagnosis and evaluation and/or supervision), the age at which it is directed (sensorimotor period and preoperational period) and the type of motor development evaluated (neurodevelopment and gross motor development and/or end). The legitimacy of psychometric tests is discussed and their characteristics, functions and abilities evaluated are analyzed.
Key words: testing; childhood; child; instrument.
References
Aragón, L. (2004). Fundamentos psicométricos de la evaluación psicológica. Revista Electrónica de Psicología de Iztacala, 7(4), 23-43.
Castro, V. J., y Cobos, R. C. R. (2016). Análisis de escalas para la evaluación del desarrollo infantil usadas en América: Una revisión de literatura. Movimiento Científico, 10(2), 72-82.
Coriat, L., & Jerusalinsky, A. (1997). Maduración y desarrollo. En Fundación para el estudio de los problemas de la infancia. Escritos de la infancia. Tomo 8.
Cools, W., De Martelaer, K., Samaey, C., & Andries, C. (2009). Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. Journal of sports science & medicine, 8(2), 154.
Davies, P. L., & Rose, J. D. (2000). Motor skills of typically developing adolescents: awkwardness or improvement?. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics, 20(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v20n01_03
Eickmann, S. H., Emond, A. M., & Lima, M. (2016). Evaluation of child development: beyond the neuromotor aspect. Jornal de pediatria, 92, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2016.01.007
Elosúa, P. (2017). Avances, proyectos y retos internacionales ligados al uso de tests en Psicología. Estudos de psicología, 34(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752017000200002
González-Fernández, E.C. (2016). Métodos y técnicas de estimulación psicomotriz temprana en los infantes de 0 a 2 años. Revista Virtual Perspectivas en la primera infancia, 4(4).
Griffiths, A., Toovey, R., Morgan, P. E., & Spittle, A. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review. BMJ open, 8(10), e021734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734
Hands, B., Licari, M., & Piek, J. (2015). A review of five tests to identify motor coordination difficulties in young adults. Research in developmental disabilities, 41, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.05.009
Pavez-Adasme, G., Hernández-Mosqueira, C., Torres, S., Paillacar, M., Concha, C., Cabrera, M., & Gómez-Álvarez, N. (2020). Test de desarrollo motor aplicados en Chile entre el período 2014-2018. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Ciencias de la Actividad Física, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29035/rcaf.21.1.1
Pena, L., & Diez, M. (2021). El uso de los test como herramientas para la intervención psicomotriz: su valor en el análisis de la estructura psicomotriz. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 11(1), 49-60 http://hdl.handle.net/10578/27310
Peralta-Cuji, I. J., Ochoa-Arévalo, V. F., & Cobos-Cali, M. E. (2021). Revisión sistemática de literatura sobre. Evaluación Neuropsicológica Infantil en Ecuador. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología, 30(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.46997/revecuatneurol30100125
Romo-Pardo, B., Liendo-Vallejos, S., Vargas-López, G., Rizzoli-Córdoba, A., & Buenrostro-Márquez, G. (2012). Pruebas de tamizaje de neurodesarrollo global para niños menores de 5 años de edad validadas en Estados Unidos y Latinoamérica: revisión sistemática y análisis comparativo. Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México, 69(6), 450-462.
Schapira, I. T. (2007). Comentarios y aportes sobre desarrollo e inteligencia sensorio-motriz en lactantes. Análisis de herramientas de evaluación de uso frecuente. Actualización bibliográfica. Revista del Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sardá, 26(1), 21-27.
Suasnabas Pacheco, S. R., Contreras Delgado, K. L., Schreiber Parra, M. J., & Suasnabas Pacheco, L. S. (2019). Influencia de la estimulación temprana en el desarrollo psicomotor en los niños y niñas de 1 y 2 años. RECIAMUC, 1(4), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.26820/reciamuc/1.4.2017.105-127
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Retos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.