Critical review of the main influences on triad motor game

Abstract

A critical review was made on the main influences and studies that have addressed the motor triad and how these approaches have formed a specific theoretical framework. One of the problems that held back the triadic construct momentum was the use of the dual mold to understand the strategic vision according to the ambivalent situations. In addition, the triadic construct reveals a greater complexity than the dual game, this issue it can be seen in Burt's 'structural hole' phenomenon or in the need for an opening of the rule to make sure the paradox emergence through the interactions between players. The triad is part of the common problem of game designs and their modifications, which leads us to look for guidelines to reveal a logic that makes sense and greater value to the alliance. A view linked to communication based on the interaction of the game roles and their reciprocity and as a reducing criterion of triadic complexity was debated. The triadic structure becomes relevant when solving the situation, especially its pedagogical value on relationships and the breakdown of the established, and how to guide the design and modification of games. Jorn's triallectic vision was raised and the scoring system and coalition were discussed.