Breaking the backbone of productivity: work-related musculoskeletal pain among KSAU-HS employees and its impact on performance and rehabilitation strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v70.116889Keywords:
Work-related musculoskeletal pain, employee productivity, ergonomic interventions, musculoskeletal disorders, academic institutionsAbstract
Introduction: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) is an increasingly prevalent occupational health issue, especially in academic environments.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and impact of WRMSP among employees at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), with particular emphasis on its effect on work productivity. The study also highlighted the potential benefits of ergonomic interventions, offering a ray of hope in addressing this issue.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 334 employees from the Riyadh, Jeddah, and Al-Ahsa campuses of KSAU-HS. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered questionnaire that captured socio-demographic details, the occurrence, location, and severity of musculoskeletal pain, and its impact on work performance. Additionally, the instrument assessed various occupational factors, including ergonomic practices and the need for workstation adjustments. Statistical analyses were performed to identify patterns and correlations between occupation type, pain severity, and work-related outcomes.
Results: Sixty-two percent of participants reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain, with the lower back, neck, and shoulders being the most commonly affected regions. Forty percent of respondents indicated that WRMSP significantly impaired their work productivity.
Discussion: Employees engaged in physically demanding roles, such as technical staff and laboratory workers, reported higher pain levels compared to those in non-physical positions. Furthermore, 46% of participants expressed needing workstation modifications to alleviate discomfort and improve ergonomic conditions.
Conclusions: WRMSP is a significant concern among KSAU-HS employees, adversely impacting productivity and overall well-being. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted ergonomic interventions.
References
Andersen, L. L., Clausen, T., Mortensen, O. S., et al. (2011). Physical activity and risk for developing low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37(4), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3130
Bernard, B. P. (1997). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemio-logic evidence. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-141/
Bongers, P. M., Kremer, A. M., & ter Laak, J. (2002). Are psychosocial factors risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist? A review of the epidemiological literature. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41(5), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10050
Buckle, P. W., & Devereux, J. J. (2002). The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskele-tal disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5
Chiu, T. T., & Ku, W. Y. (2002). Ergonomics training reduces musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: A longitudinal study. Occupational Medicine (London), 52(7), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.7.409
Frangos, E., Papanastasiou, E., Tsitskari, A., et al. (2016). The importance of ergonomic interventions in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 22(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1129286
Govaerts, R., Tassignon, B., Ghillebert, J., et al. (2021). Prevalence and incidence of work-related mus-culoskeletal disorders in secondary industries of 21st century Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22, 751. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04575-4
Hignett, S., Crumpton, E., Green, N., et al. (2009). The role of ergonomics in enhancing workplace productivity. Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.001
Hoe, V. C., Urquhart, D. M., Kelsall, H. L., et al. (2012). Occupational risk factors associated with low back pain in large-scale epidemiological studies: A systematic review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 18(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1179/1077352512Z.0000000003
Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N., Koes, B. W., et al. (2000). Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 25(16), 2114–2125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017
Karsh, B. T., Booske, M. L., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Theories of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Implications for ergonomic interventions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(1–2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220110094665
Punnett, L., & Wegman, D. H. (2004). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evi-dence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015
Robertson, M. M., & Huang, Y. H. (2006). Effect of a workplace design intervention on health-related outcomes among computer workers: A systematic review. Work, 27(3), 235–248.
Sauter, S. L., Schleifer, L. M., & Knutson, S. J. (1991). Psychosocial and organizational factors in work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Ergonomics, 34(10), 1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108964868
Sharan, D., Rajkumar, K. S., & Parthasarathy, S. (2011). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Indian computer professionals. Work, 39(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1174
Woods, V. (2005). Musculoskeletal disorders and visual strain in intensive data processing workers. Occupational Medicine (London), 55(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi022
World Health Organization. (2021). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace health. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meshal AlAnazi, Paramasivan Mani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
