Avaliação da literacia física entre alunos do ensino básico na Indonésia: uma análise de validade e fiabilidade do instrumento PL-C Quest utilizando o modelo Rasch.

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v69.114348

Palavras-chave:

Literacia física, modelo Rasch, validade, fiabilidade, educação física, capacidades motoras

Resumo

Introdução. Uma boa literacia física é importante para que os alunos tenham uma vida melhor. Por isso, é necessário avaliá-la. Objetivos. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o nível de literacia física dos alunos do ensino básico na Indonésia, com foco na validade e fiabilidade do instrumento de medida PL-C Quest. Metodologia. Utilizando o modelo Rasch para a análise de dados, este estudo mediu dimensões da literacia física, incluindo aspetos físicos, psicológicos, sociais e cognitivos. A amostra do estudo foi constituída por 120 alunos de três províncias da Indonésia. Os dados foram analisados ​​utilizando a aplicação WINSTEPS versão 4.7.0 para garantir a precisão da medição. Resultados. Foi demonstrado que 70% dos alunos estavam na categoria "alta" na literacia física, com pontos fortes nos aspetos sociais e cognitivos. No entanto, o principal desafio reside no desenvolvimento de capacidades motoras mais complexas, como o equilíbrio, a coordenação e a resistência. A análise Rasch mostrou que o instrumento PL-C Quest apresentou uma fiabilidade adequada, com um valor de alfa de Cronbach de 0,78, e uma boa validade para medir as dimensões da literacia física. Embora a fiabilidade do instrumento tenha sido boa, alguns itens tiveram de ser melhorados, especialmente aqueles que mediam as capacidades motoras dos alunos.
Discussão. Foi revelada a importância de programas de intervenção que se concentrem mais no desenvolvimento das competências motoras básicas e na utilização de instrumentos de medição mais precisos. Este estudo contribui significativamente para o desenvolvimento de políticas de educação física e desportiva na Indonésia e apoia o alcance da Meta Indonésia para 2045.
Conclusão. A literacia física dos alunos do ensino básico tem um grande potencial de desenvolvimento, mas exige o aperfeiçoamento das capacidades motoras e dos instrumentos de medição.

Referências

Andrade, C. (2018). Internal, external, and ecological validity in research design, conduct, and evaluation. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(5), 498-499. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM. IJPSYM_334_18

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education, Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Barnett, L. M., Mazzoli, E., Bowe, S. J., Lander, N., & Salmon, J. (2022). Reliability and validity of the PL-C Quest, a scale designed to assess children’s self-reported physical literacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102164

Barnett, L. M., Vazou, S., Abbott, G., Bowe, S. J., Robinson, L. E., Ridgers, N. D., & Salmon, J. (2016). Construct validity of the pictorial scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.002

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences: Second edition. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 1-340. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781410614575

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, Third Edition 3rd Edition. In Maternal & Child Nutrition, 11(supplement S2), 128-129.

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, 1-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Brunton, L. K. (2017). Clinicians Are the Missing Link to Sustainable Community-Based Physical Activity Participation for Children with Disabilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics , 37(4), 359–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2017.1327750

Cairney, J., Dudley, D., Kwan, M., Bulten, R., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical Literacy, Physical Activity and Health: Toward an Evidence-Informed Conceptual Model. Sports Medicine, 49(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3

Cornish, K., Fox, G., Fyfe, T., Koopmans, E., Pousette, A., & Pelletier, C. A. (2020). Understanding physical literacy in the context of health: a rapid scoping review. BMC Public Health, 20(1). https: //doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09583-8

Crowe, R. K., Probst, Y. C., Stanley, R. M., Ryan, S. T., Weaver, R. G., Beets, M. W., Norman, J. A., Furber, S. E., Vuong, C., Hammersley, M. L., Wardle, K., Franco, L., Davies, M., Innes-Hughes, C., & Okely, A. D. (2021). Physical activity in out of school hours care: an observational study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01197-6

Diao, Y., Dong, C., Barnett, L. M., Estevan, I., Li, J., & Ji, L. (2018). Validity and reliability of a Pictorial Instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in Chinese children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6, S223–S238. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0082

Diao, Y., Wang, L., Chen, S., Barnett, L. M., Mazzoli, E., Essiet, I. A., Wang, X., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., Li, X., & Li, J. (2024). The validity of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire in children aged 4 to 12. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18343-x

DING, X., ZHANG, T., DENG, X., SANG, B., FANG, L., & CHENG, C. (2015). “Alone but not lonely” or “Alone and also lonely”: Cultural Differences on Relations between Unsociability and Adjustment Functioning. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(3), 439. https://doi.org/10.3724/ sp.j.1042.2015.00439

Dunne , T., Long, C., Craig, T., & Venter, E. (2012). Meeting the requirements of both classroom-based and systemic assessment of mathematics proficiency: The potential of rasch measurement theory. Pythagoras, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.19

Gonzálvez, C., Sanmartín, R., Vicent, M., Inglés, C. J., Aparicio-Flores, M. P., & García-Fernández, J. M. (2018). Academic self-attributions for success and failure in mathematics and school refusal. Psychology in the Schools, 55(4), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22117

Greve, S., Diekhoff, H., & Süßenbach, J. (2022). Learning Soccer in Elementary School: Using Teaching Games for Understanding and Digital Media. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc.2022.862798

Hadley, F., Waniganayake, M., Mevawalla, Z., Jones, C., Blythin, S., & Beauchamp, D. (2021). Keeping Children Safe in Out-of-School-Hours Care: Perceptions of Staff and Managers of One Provider in Sydney, Australia. Child Abuse Review, 30(4), 318-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2683

Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items Quality Analysis Using Rasch Model To Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill On Stem Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.20884

Jones, G. R., Stathokostas, L., Young, B. W., Wister, A. V., Chau, S., Clark, P., Duggan, M., Mitchell, D., & Nordland, P. (2018). Development of a physical literacy model for older adults - A consensus process by the collaborative working group on physical literacy for older Canadians. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0687-x

Keeves, J. P., & Alagumalai, S. (2005). Applied Rasch measurement: a book of exemplars: papers in honour of John P. Keeves. In Education in the Asia-Pacific region series (Issue v. 4).

Kline, P. (2015). A Handbook of Test Construction (Psychology Revivals) : Introduction to Psychometric Design. In A Handbook of Test Construction (Psychology Revivals).

Kristyasari, M. L., Asmaningrum, H. P., & Hanif, R. F. (2022). Wright-Map to Analyze Students’ Abilities on Chemical Bond Test. SHS Web of Conferences, 149. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/ 202214901050

Li, M. H., Sum, R. K. W., Tremblay, M., Sit, C. H. P., Ha, A. S. C., & Wong, S. H. S. (2020). Cross-validation of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy second edition (CAPL-2): The case of a Chinese population. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(24). https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1803016

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 44–53.

Linacre, J. M. (2012). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP: Rasch-Model Computer Programs. In Winsteps.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive Motivation and Emotion in Education: Research and Principles for Instructional Design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216644450

Lopes, V. P., Barnett, L. M., Saraiva, L., Gonçalves, C., Bowe, S. J., Abbott, G., & Rodrigues, L. P. (2016). Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12359

Lyngstad, I., & Sæther, E. (2021). The concept of ‘friluftsliv literacy’ in relation to physical literacy in physical education pedagogies. Sport, Education and Society, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1762073

Peeters, M. J., & Harpe, S. E. (2022). Contemporary conceptualization of measurement validity. In Contemporary Research Methods in Pharmacy and Health Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91888-6.00020-X

Pemuda, K., & Indonesia, O. R. (2022). Olahraga, Daya Saing, dan Kebijakan Berbasis Data. Img-Deputi3.Kemenpora.Go.Id.

Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020111

Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice: International Edition, 3/E. In Pearson internationnal edition.

Shearer, C., Goss, H. R., Edwards, L. C., Keegan, R. J., Knowles, Z. R., Boddy, L. M., Durden-Myers, E. J., & Foweather, L. (2018). How is physical literacy defined? A contemporary update. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0136

Stoddart, A. L., Humbert, M. L., Kerpan, S., Cameron, N., & Kriellaars, D. (2023). PLitPE: an intervention for physical literacy enriched pedagogy in Canadian elementary school physical education classes. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(6), 675-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989. 2021.2014438

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. In AplikAsi RascH pemodelAn Pada Assessment Pendidikan (Issue September).

Tang, Y., Algurén, B., Pelletier, C., Naylor, P. J., & Faulkner, G. (2023). Physical Literacy for Communities (PL4C): physical literacy, physical activity and associations with wellbeing. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16050-7

Tsujimoto, K. C., Frijters, J. C., Boada, R., Gottwald, S., Hill, D., Jacobson, L. A., Lovett, M. W., Mark Mahone, E., Willcutt, E. G., Wolf, M., Bosson-Heenan, J., & Gruen, J. R. (2018). Achievement attributions are associated with specific rather than general learning delays. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.002

Vuletich, H. A., Kurtz-Costes, B., Bollen, K. A., & Rowley, S. J. (2019). A longitudinal study of the domain-generality of African American students’ causal attributions for academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000299

Wahyu, Y., Edu, A. L., & Nardi, M. (2020). Problematika Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.344

Wainwright, N., Goodway, J., John, A., Thomas, K., Piper, K., Williams, K., & Gardener, D. (2020). Developing children’s motor skills in the Foundation Phase in Wales to support physical literacy. Education 3-13, 48(5), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1633374

Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. In Physical Literacy: Throughout the Lifecourse, 1-230. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881903

WHO. (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IG. Who. 28(6) 615-627.

Woessner, M. N., Tacey, A., Levinger-Limor, A., Parker, A. G., Levinger, P., & Levinger, I. (2021). The Evolution of Technology and Physical Inactivity: The Good, the Bad, and the Way Forward. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.655491

WRIGHT, B. D. (1977). SOLVING MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS WITH THE RASCH MODEL. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00031.x

Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.

Zhong Y, Fan W. (2020). Cognitive Neuroscience of the Self. Beijing: Science Press.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-07-01

Como Citar

Chaeroni, A., Ardha, M. A. A., & Nur, L. (2025). Avaliação da literacia física entre alunos do ensino básico na Indonésia: uma análise de validade e fiabilidade do instrumento PL-C Quest utilizando o modelo Rasch. Retos, 69, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v69.114348

Edição

Secção

Experiências didáticas desenvolvidas e investigadas com trabalhos empíricos